Johnson v. M'Intosh

21 U.S. 543 · Supreme Court of the United States · 1823

Property Assigned in 17 casebooks

Case brief summary

Rule

Under the legal idea called the discovery doctrine, the government that discovered land in America got the only right to buy or take land from Native American tribes, and tribes could not sell land directly to private individuals.

Facts

Private individuals bought two large tracts of land directly from the Piankeshaw and Illinois tribes in the 1770s, but the United States government later granted some of that same land to a different person.

Procedural history

A lower federal court in Illinois ruled against people who bought land from tribes. They appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to review the lower court's decision.

Issue

Can a land title obtained by buying land directly from a Native American tribe be recognized as valid ownership in United States courts?

Holding

No, land bought directly from Native American tribes cannot be recognized as valid title in United States courts, so the government-granted title wins.

Reasoning

Because discovering new land gave European nations, and later the U.S., the only right to get land from tribes, tribes could use the land but only the government could grant valid land ownership.

Opinions

Majority (Marshall): Land titles bought straight from Native American tribes cannot be recognized by courts because tribes only had a right to occupy land, not to sell full ownership.

Test yourself

Question 1 of 5

From whom did the plaintiffs (Johnson and Graham's Lessee) claim to have purchased the disputed land?

4 more questions in the full brief →
Cold call

The professor turns to you.

What were the facts of this case, and who were the two competing claimants to the land?
Try a cold call

In the full brief

The trap

On the exam

Other issues in this opinion

Unlock the full brief free